• Users Online: 1107
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
METHODOLOGY
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 93-100

Assessing equivalency during the implementation of a health profession's program to a distant campus: Development of a distant campus evaluation tool


Department of Physician Assistant Studies, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Theresa A Bacon-Baguley
301 Michigan Street NE, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/EHP.EHP_26_20

Rights and Permissions

Universities are constantly looking at technology driven approaches in providing distant education. As technology evolves, another layer of evaluation is essential to assure the mode of delivery does not interfere with the delivery of content. Although guidelines are available for evaluating an academic program, there are no evaluation tools published to assess the equivalency of education when a program expands to a distant campus. This manuscript describes the development and utilization of a tool to assess equivalency in delivery of a program to a distant campus that utilizes videoconferencing technology in delivering the curriculum. The tool was based on four major areas of potential concern when using technology to deliver the curriculum: (1) technology limitations, (2) confidence in the system, (3) faculty ability to deliver the content, and (4) resources available at each site. Data obtained from implementing the tool identified site specific concerns, as well as concerns common to both sites.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed260    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal